Volvo S40 2000 vs Ford Mondeo 1996

 
Volvo S40
2000 - 2002
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 102 HP90 HP
Torque: 215 NM177 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds13.2 seconds
Volvo S40 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S40 engine produces 12 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.46.3
Real fuel consumption: 5.3 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo S40 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Volvo S40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S40 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1420 km on highway1290 km on highway
1130 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption
Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.56 m
Width: 1.72 m1.75 m
Height: 1.41 m1.37 m
Volvo S40 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volvo S40 is 8 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S40 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 471 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
853 litres1290 litres
Volvo S40 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 437 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Volvo S40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7701`855
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Ford Mondeo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S40 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 800600
Rating in user reviews: 7.0/10 8.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Mondeo has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv