Volvo S40 2000 vs Volkswagen Bora 1998

 
Volvo S40
2000 - 2002
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 102 HP68 HP
Torque: 215 NM133 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds18 seconds
Volvo S40 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S40 engine produces 34 HP more power than Volkswagen Bora, whereas torque is 82 NM more than Volkswagen Bora. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.45.2
Volvo S40 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle1050 km in combined cycle
1420 km on highway1270 km on highway
Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.38 m
Width: 1.72 m1.74 m
Height: 1.41 m1.45 m
Volvo S40 is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Bora, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S40 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 471 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
853 litres785 litres
Volvo S40 has 16 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Bora. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S40 (by 68 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight: 1`770 kg1`790 kg
Net weight:1`285 kg1`265 kg
Load capacity:485 kg525 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 8001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.0/10 7.8/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • more spacious trunk with the seats down
  • lower price
Volkswagen Bora has
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv