Volvo S40 1997 vs Citroen Xsara 1998

 
Volvo S40
1997 - 2000
Citroen Xsara
1998 - 1999
Body: SedanCoupe
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.9 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 200 HP103 HP
Torque: 300 NM153 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds15.4 seconds
Volvo S40 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S40 engine produces 97 HP more power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 147 NM more than Citroen Xsara. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.79.1
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S40 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle590 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway780 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.17 m
Width: 1.72 m1.70 m
Height: 1.41 m1.40 m
Volvo S40 is larger.
Volvo S40 is 31 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S40 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 471 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
853 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7801`100
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Volvo S40 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen Xsara, so Volvo S40 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 600800
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Citroen Xsara has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv