Volvo S40 1999 vs Volkswagen Passat 1985
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Volvo S40 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S40 engine produces 46 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Volkswagen Passat. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.5 | |
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S40 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S40 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |