Volvo S40 1996 vs Volvo S40 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 183 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Volvo S40 1996 engine produces 4 HP more power than Volvo S40 2000, but torque is 7 NM less than Volvo S40 2000. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.3 | |
The Volvo S40 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S40 1996 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 1996 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Volvo S40 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 1996 and Volvo S40 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 471 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | 853 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 7.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |