Volvo S40 1998 vs Toyota Avensis 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 174 NM | 150 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
Volvo S40 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S40 engine produces 15 HP more power than Toyota Avensis, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Toyota Avensis. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
The Toyota Avensis is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo S40 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis, which means that by driving the Volvo S40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo S40 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 23 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V40, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Galant | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E, Toyota Celica | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo S40 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Volvo S40 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Avensis, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S40 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Avensis. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`300 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | high | |
Toyota Avensis has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S40 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota Avensis, so Toyota Avensis quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Toyota Avensis has
| |