Volvo S40 1996 vs Volkswagen Bora 1998

 
Volvo S40
1996 - 1999
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 115 HP101 HP
Torque: 165 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds12 seconds
Volvo S40 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S40 engine produces 14 HP more power than Volkswagen Bora, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Bora. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.67.5
Real fuel consumption: 8.7 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The Volkswagen Bora is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo S40 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 could require 165 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S40 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway940 km on highway
680 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Bora engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 4 years14 years
Engine spread: Used also on Volvo V40Used also on Volkswagen Golf
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Bora might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.38 m
Width: 1.72 m1.74 m
Height: 1.41 m1.45 m
Volvo S40 is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Bora, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S40 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 471 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
853 litres785 litres
Volvo S40 has 16 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Bora. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S40 (by 68 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7201`720
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 6001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.1/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Volkswagen Bora has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv