Volvo S40 1995 vs Volvo S40 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 95 HP | |
Torque: | 176 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Volvo S40 1999 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S40 1995 engine produces 5 HP less power than Volvo S40 1999, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Volvo S40 1999. Due to the lower power, Volvo S40 1995 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.6 | |
The Volvo S40 1999 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S40 1995 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40 1999, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 1995 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
Volvo S40 1999 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 1995 and Volvo S40 1999 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 471 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | 853 litres | |
Volvo S40 1999 has more luggage space. Volvo S40 1995 has 56 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40 1999. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`770 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo S40 has
| |