Volvo S40 1995 vs Citroen Xsara 1999
Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 143 NM | 135 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
Volvo S40 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S40 engine produces 15 HP more power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Citroen Xsara. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.8 | |
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S40 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.17 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
Volvo S40 is larger. Volvo S40 is 31 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S40 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`100 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Volvo S40 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen Xsara, so Volvo S40 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |