Volvo S40 1996 vs Volvo S40 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 183 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Volvo S40 1996 engine produces 4 HP more power than Volvo S40 2000, but torque is 7 NM less than Volvo S40 2000. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.1 | |
Volvo S40 1996 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 1996 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 1996 and Volvo S40 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 471 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | 853 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`770 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 7.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
| |