Volvo S40 2007 vs Volkswagen Polo 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo S40 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S40 engine produces 35 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 67 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.0 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S40 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Volvo S40 2007 2.4 engine: The strengths of this engine lie in its durable components, long lifespan, reliability in everyday use, and substantial power reserves.
However, there are notable weaknesses. Early models were equipped ... More about Volvo S40 2007 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volvo S40 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo S40 is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S40 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
883 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S40 has 56 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. This could mean that the Volvo S40 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S40 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |