Volvo S40 2007 vs SAAB 9-3 2010

 
Volvo S40
2007 - 2012
SAAB 9-3
2010 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.9 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 110 HP180 HP
Torque: 240 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds8.5 seconds
SAAB 9-3 is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo S40 engine produces 70 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 160 NM less than SAAB 9-3. Due to the lower power, Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.95.3
Real fuel consumption: 5.6 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo S40 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Volvo S40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S40 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S40 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years4 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo V50, Volvo C30Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo S40 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.65 m
Width: 1.77 m2.04 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Volvo S40 is smaller.
Volvo S40 is 17 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, 27 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S40 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 404 litres351 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
883 litresno data
Volvo S40 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volvo S40 has 53 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. The SAAB 9-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`8902`030
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 34004400
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
SAAB 9-3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv