Volvo S40 2007 vs Kia Cerato 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo S40 engine produces 5 HP less power than Kia Cerato, but torque is 5 NM more than Kia Cerato. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 55 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo V50, Volvo C30 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 and Kia Cerato are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 345 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
883 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo S40 has more luggage capacity. Volvo S40 has 59 litres more trunk space than the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato, which means Volvo S40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 1`254 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |