Volvo S40 2002 vs Volvo S40 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 165 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Volvo S40 2002 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S40 2002 engine produces 29 HP more power than Volvo S40 2000, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo S40 2000. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.3 | |
The Volvo S40 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S40 2002 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40 2000, which means that by driving the Volvo S40 2002 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 2002 and Volvo S40 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 471 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | 853 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |