Volvo S40 2002 vs Alfa Romeo 156 2002

 
Volvo S40
2002 - 2004
Alfa Romeo 156
2002 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 165 HP165 HP
Torque: 240 NM206 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds8.2 seconds
Volvo S40 and Alfa Romeo 156 have the same engine power, but Volvo S40 torque is 34 NM more than Alfa Romeo 156. Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.98.6
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S40 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Volvo S40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway950 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.43 m
Width: 1.72 m1.74 m
Height: 1.41 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 is 5 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 156, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S40 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 471 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
853 litresno data
Volvo S40 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo S40 has 91 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7801`770
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

low
Volvo S40 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo S40, so Volvo S40 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 14001000
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv