Volvo S40 2002 vs Volvo C30 2006
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo S40 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S40 engine produces 40 HP more power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Volvo C30. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.3 | |
|
The Volvo C30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S40 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.45 m | |
| Volvo S40 is 23 cm longer than the Volvo C30, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S40 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo S40 has more luggage capacity. Volvo S40 has 220 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo C30, which means Volvo S40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Volvo C30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S40 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volvo C30, so Volvo C30 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |