Volvo S40 2002 vs Volvo S40 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 167 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Volvo S40 2002 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S40 2002 engine produces 2 HP more power than Volvo S40 2001, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Volvo S40 2001. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
|
The Volvo S40 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S40 2002 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40 2001, which means that by driving the Volvo S40 2002 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S40 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 2002 and Volvo S40 2001 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | 853 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 6.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |