Volvo S40 2002 vs Volvo V40 1999
Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 122 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Volvo S40 and Volvo V40 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.9 | |
Volvo S40 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Volvo S40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 and Volvo V40 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Volvo S40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | Volvo S40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V40 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo S40, so Volvo S40 quality is probably slightly better | ||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 6.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |