Volvo S40 1995 vs Volkswagen Passat 1985
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.6 - 1.9 | 1.3 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 200 HP | 54 - 136 HP | |
Torque: | 143 - 300 NM | 100 - 184 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 13 seconds | 9.5 - 25.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 9.7 | 6.0 - 10.3 | |
Volvo S40 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Volvo S40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S40 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Volvo S40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`756 | ~ 1`267 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
| |