Volvo S40 1995 vs Citroen Xsara 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 200 HP | 68 - 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 - 300 NM | 112 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 13 seconds | 8.7 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 9.7 | 5.2 - 9.4 | |
|
Volvo S40 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. On average, a Volvo S40 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Citroen Xsara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Volvo S40 is larger. Volvo S40 is 31 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S40 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`756 | ~ 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |