Volvo S40 2007 vs Volvo S60 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S40
2007 - 2012
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.52.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 100 - 230 HP126 - 300 HP
Torque: 150 - 400 NM192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 - 12 seconds5.7 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.8 - 10.06.4 - 13.0
Volvo S40 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, Volvo S40 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.59 m
Width: 1.77 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.43 m
Volvo S40 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volvo S40 is 11 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S40 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 404 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
883 litres1034 litres
Volvo S40 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 151 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 1.9 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Volvo S40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`945~ 2`031
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 46003200
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo S60 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv