Volvo S40 2007 vs Volvo V50 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 230 HP | 100 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 400 NM | 150 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 12 seconds | 6.9 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 10.0 | 5.0 - 10.1 | |
|
Volvo S40 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V50. On average, Volvo S40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo S40 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
883 litres | no data | |
| Volvo S40 has 13 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`945 | ~ 1`943 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |