Volvo S40 2007 vs Volvo C30 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volvo S40 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo C30 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 230 HP | 100 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 400 NM | 150 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 12 seconds | 6.7 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 10.0 | 4.9 - 9.4 | |
|
Volvo S40 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo C30. On average, Volvo S40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Volvo S40 is 23 cm longer than the Volvo C30, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
883 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo S40 has more luggage capacity. Volvo S40 has 153 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo C30, which means Volvo S40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`945 | ~ 1`816 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |