Volvo S40 2007 vs BMW 3 series 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S40
2007 - 2012
BMW 3 series
2008 - 2012
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volvo S40 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo S40 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.51.6 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 100 - 230 HP122 - 306 HP
Torque: 150 - 400 NM160 - 580 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 - 12 seconds5.5 - 11.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.8 - 10.04.7 - 9.7
Volvo S40 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, Volvo S40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.53 m
Width: 1.77 m1.82 m
Height: 1.45 m1.42 m
Volvo S40 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volvo S40 is 5 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S40 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 404 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
883 litresno data
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Volvo S40 has 56 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.1 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`945~ 2`023
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 46005800
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv