Volvo S40 2002 vs Volvo V40 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S40
2002 - 2004
Volvo V40
1996 - 2000
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 1.91.6 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 102 - 200 HP90 - 200 HP
Torque: 145 - 300 NM145 - 300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 12 seconds7.3 - 13 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.4 - 10.05.6 - 9.7
Volvo S40 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Volvo S40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.48 m
Width: 1.72 m1.72 m
Height: 1.41 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 and Volvo V40 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 471 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
853 litres1421 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Volvo S40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`768~ 1`774
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 1200600
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 6.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo V40 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv