Volvo S40 2002 vs Volvo V40 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.6 - 1.9 | 1.6 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 102 - 200 HP | 90 - 200 HP | |
Torque: | 145 - 300 NM | 145 - 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 12 seconds | 7.3 - 13 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 10.0 | 5.6 - 9.7 | |
Volvo S40 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Volvo S40 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 and Volvo V40 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 471 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | 1421 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Volvo S40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`768 | ~ 1`774 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 6.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |