Volvo S40 2002 vs Volvo S40 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 1.9 | 1.6 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 102 - 200 HP | 90 - 200 HP | |
Torque: | 145 - 300 NM | 143 - 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 12 seconds | 7.3 - 13 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 10.0 | 5.4 - 10.0 | |
On average, the Volvo S40 2002 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volvo S40 1995. On average, Volvo S40 2002 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40 1995. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 2002 and Volvo S40 1995 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 471 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | 853 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`768 | ~ 1`761 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |