Volvo S40 2002 vs Volvo 960 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Volvo S40 is available with front wheel drive, while Volvo 960 can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.9 | 2.0 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 - 200 HP | 115 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 300 NM | 225 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 12 seconds | 9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 10.0 | 8.1 - 11.2 | |
|
Volvo S40 petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo 960. On average, Volvo S40 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Volvo S40 is smaller. Volvo S40 is 39 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 491 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | no data | |
| Volvo S40 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 960. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Volvo S40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`768 | ~ 2`027 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |