Volvo 960 1994 vs Mercedes E class 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Volvo 960) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mercedes E class) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 267 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 960 engine produces 109 HP more power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 117 NM more than Mercedes E class. Thanks to more power Volvo 960 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.0 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes E class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo 960 consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 600 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 960 consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes E class engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo S90, Volvo V90 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo 960 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volvo 960 is 7 cm longer than the Mercedes E class, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 960 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 491 litres | 515 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo 960 has 24 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class. This could mean that the Volvo 960 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 1.5 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Volvo 960 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |