Volvo 960 1994 vs Volvo S60 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 960 engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 87 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Volvo 960 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo 960 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 960 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
| Volvo 960 is 29 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 960 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 491 litres | 424 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1034 litres | |
|
Volvo 960 has more luggage capacity. Volvo 960 has 67 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 2.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Volvo 960 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |