Volvo 960 1994 vs BMW 3 series 1998

 
Volvo 960
1994 - 1997
BMW 3 series
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 170 HP170 HP
Torque: 233 NM245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds8 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo 960 and BMW 3 series have the same engine power, but Volvo 960 torque is 12 NM less than BMW 3 series. Volvo 960 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.59.0
Real fuel consumption: 11.3 l/100km9.3 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo 960 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 225 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 960 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
700 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Volvo 960 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.47 m
Width: 1.75 m1.74 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Volvo 960 is larger.
Volvo 960 is 40 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 960 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 491 litres440 litres
Volvo 960 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo 960 has 51 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9601`870
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 14002000
Pros and Cons: Volvo 960 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv