Volvo 960 1990 vs Seat Toledo 1991
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 267 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 960 engine produces 133 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 143 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Volvo 960 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 7.4 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 960 consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 540 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Toledo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Volvo 960) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Volvo 960 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo 960 is 55 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 960 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 491 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1360 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo 960 has 59 litres less trunk space than the Seat Toledo. This could mean that the Volvo 960 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Volvo 960 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |