Volvo 960 1990 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 267 NM | 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Scorpio is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 960 engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, but torque is 8 NM less than Ford Scorpio. Despite the higher power, Volvo 960 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 11.2 | |
| Volvo 960 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Volvo 960 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 960 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
| Volvo 960 is 13 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 960 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 491 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Volvo 960 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`960 kg | 1`850 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
| |