Volvo 960 1990 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 267 NM | 228 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 960 engine produces 58 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Volvo 960 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.3 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 960 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 960 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
| Volvo 960 is 13 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 960 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 491 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Volvo 960 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |