Volvo 960 1990 vs Ford Sierra 1990
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 HP | 220 HP | |
Torque: | 267 NM | 290 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
Ford Sierra is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 960 engine produces 16 HP less power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Ford Sierra. Due to the lower power, Volvo 960 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
By specification Volvo 960 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 960 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
640 km with real consumption | 490 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo 960 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
Volvo 960 is larger. Volvo 960 is 38 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 960 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 491 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Sierra. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`350 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |