Volvo 960 1990 vs Ford Sierra 1990

 
Volvo 960
1990 - 1994
Ford Sierra
1990 - 1993
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.9 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 204 HP220 HP
Torque: 267 NM290 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds6.9 seconds
Ford Sierra is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo 960 engine produces 16 HP less power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Ford Sierra. Due to the lower power, Volvo 960 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.010.6
Real fuel consumption: 12.4 l/100km12.1 l/100km
By specification Volvo 960 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 960 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
640 km with real consumption490 km with real consumption
Volvo 960 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.49 m
Width: 1.75 m1.70 m
Height: 1.41 m1.38 m
Volvo 960 is larger.
Volvo 960 is 38 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 960 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 491 litresno data
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Sierra.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9601`350
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 18002200
Pros and Cons: Volvo 960 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Ford Sierra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv