Volvo 960 1990 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 267 NM | 166 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 960 engine produces 99 HP more power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 101 NM more than Ford Sierra. Thanks to more power Volvo 960 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo 960 consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 525 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 960 consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Volvo 960 is larger. Volvo 960 is 40 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 491 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Sierra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |