Volvo 960 1994 vs Opel Omega 1999

 
Volvo 960
1994 - 1997
Opel Omega
1999 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 170 HP170 HP
Torque: 233 NM227 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds10 seconds
Volvo 960 and Opel Omega have the same engine power, but Volvo 960 torque is 6 NM more than Opel Omega. Volvo 960 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.610.5
Real fuel consumption: 11.3 l/100km10.5 l/100km
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo 960 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 960 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
700 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.90 m
Width: 1.75 m1.78 m
Height: 1.46 m1.50 m
Volvo 960 is smaller.
Volvo 960 is 4 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 960 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 992 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2125 litres1800 litres
Volvo 960 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volvo 960 has 452 litres more trunk space than the Opel Omega. The Opel Omega may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 960 (by 325 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Volvo 960 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0602`280
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 22001200
Pros and Cons: Volvo 960 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv