Volvo 960 1990 vs Volvo 850 1993
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo 850 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 960 engine produces 48 HP less power than Volvo 850, but torque is 15 NM more than Volvo 850. Due to the lower power, Volvo 960 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.1 | |
|
The Volvo 960 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 960 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850, which means that by driving the Volvo 960 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 960 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo 850) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Volvo 960) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
| Volvo 960 is 10 cm longer than the Volvo 850, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 960 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo 850. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
Volvo 850 has
| |