Volvo 960 1990 vs Moskvitch 412 1967
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 19 seconds | |
| Volvo 960 engine produces 115 HP more power than Moskvitch 412, whereas torque is 172 NM more than Moskvitch 412. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 46 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.55 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.48 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 491 litres | 350 litres | |
|
Volvo 960 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volvo 960 has 141 litres more trunk space than the Moskvitch 412. The Moskvitch 412 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
| |