Volvo 960 1990 vs Audi 100 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Volvo 960 engine produces 89 HP more power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 123 NM more than Audi 100. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 8.3 | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 960 consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo 960 is 8 cm longer than the Audi 100, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 960 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 491 litres | 510 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Volvo 960 has 19 litres less trunk space than the Audi 100. This could mean that the Volvo 960 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
Audi 100 has
| |