Volvo 960 1990 vs BMW 5 series 1992

 
Volvo 960
1990 - 1994
BMW 5 series
1992 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 190 HP150 HP
Torque: 280 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.3 seconds
Volvo 960 engine produces 40 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 90 NM more than BMW 5 series.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.29.7
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo 960 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 225 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway1120 km on highway
BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.72 m
Width: 1.75 m1.75 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Volvo 960 is 13 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo 960 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 992 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2125 litres910 litres
Volvo 960 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo 960 has 532 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 960 (by 1215 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 1.1 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Volvo 960 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 30002600
Pros and Cons: Volvo 960 has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
BMW 5 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv