Volvo 960 1990 vs BMW 5 series 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
Volvo 960 engine produces 40 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 90 NM more than BMW 5 series. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.7 | |
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 960 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 960 could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
Volvo 960 is 13 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo 960 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | 910 litres | |
Volvo 960 has more luggage capacity. Volvo 960 has 532 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 960 (by 1215 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 1.1 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Volvo 960 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`100 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 3000 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |