Volvo 960 1994 vs BMW 3 series 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo 960
1994 - 1997
BMW 3 series
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volvo 960 is available only with rear wheel drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.5 - 2.9 (petrol)1.9 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 170 - 204 HP105 - 231 HP
Torque: 233 - 267 NM165 - 390 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 - 10 seconds6.5 - 14 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.5 - 11.15.7 - 10.0
Volvo 960 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.47 m
Width: 1.75 m1.74 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Volvo 960 is larger.
Volvo 960 is 40 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 960 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 491 litres440 litres
Volvo 960 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo 960 has 51 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 960 is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`960~ 1`936
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 14002000
Pros and Cons: Volvo 960 has
  • only petrol engines available
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv