Volvo 960 1990 vs Moskvitch 412 1967
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Volvo 960 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Moskvitch 412 is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | 1.5 (petrol) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo 960 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 204 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 225 - 280 NM | 108 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 13 seconds | 19 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 11.2 | no data | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | no data | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.55 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.48 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 491 litres | 350 litres | |
Volvo 960 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volvo 960 has 141 litres more trunk space than the Moskvitch 412. The Moskvitch 412 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`027 | ~ 1`520 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 960 has
|
Moskvitch 412 has
| |