Volvo 850 1996 vs Mercedes E class 1995

 
Volvo 850
1996 - 1997
Mercedes E class
1995 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 140 HP95 HP
Torque: 290 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds17 seconds
Volvo 850 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo 850 engine produces 45 HP more power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Mercedes E class. Thanks to more power Volvo 850 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.67.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km7.2 l/100km
The Volvo 850 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo 850 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Volvo 850 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 850 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class.
Fuel tank capacity: 73 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1100 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1400 km on highway1160 km on highway
1100 km with real consumption900 km with real consumption
Volvo 850 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo 850) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km630'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes E class engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S70Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo 850 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.80 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.41 m1.42 m
Volvo 850 is smaller.
Volvo 850 is 13 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 850 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 445 litres515 litres
Mercedes E class has more luggage space.
Volvo 850 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Volvo 850 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9601`960
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Mercedes E class has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo 850, so Mercedes E class quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 14002200
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 9.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo 850 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Mercedes E klase has
  • timing chain engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv