Volvo 850 1994 vs Volvo S60 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 240 HP | 250 HP | |
Torque: | 330 NM | 330 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 850 engine produces 10 HP less power than Volvo S60, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volvo 850 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 10.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
The Volvo S60 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo 850 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volvo 850 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo 850 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
580 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
Volvo 850 is 9 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 850 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 424 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1034 litres | |
Volvo 850 has more luggage capacity. Volvo 850 has 21 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Volvo 850 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`030 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 850 has serious deffects in 300 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 850 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |