Volvo 850 1994 vs Toyota Camry 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo 850 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 850 engine produces 88 HP more power than Toyota Camry, whereas torque is 112 NM more than Toyota Camry. Thanks to more power Volvo 850 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 9.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 580 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Camry 2001 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Volvo 850 is smaller. Volvo 850 is 15 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 850 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Camry, which means Volvo 850 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 850 has
|
| |