Volvo 850 1994 vs Mazda Xedos 6 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda Xedos 6 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 850 engine produces 21 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 6, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Mazda Xedos 6. Due to the lower power, Volvo 850 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 9.1 | |
| Volvo 850 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 6, which means that by driving the Volvo 850 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 850 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo 850 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S70 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Xedos 9 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Xedos 6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Volvo 850 is larger. Volvo 850 is 11 cm longer than the Mazda Xedos 6, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 850 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Volvo 850 has more luggage capacity. Volvo 850 has 55 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda Xedos 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 850 has
|
Mazda Xedos 6 has
| |