Volvo 850 1992 vs Volvo S60 2000

 
Volvo 850
1992 - 1994
Volvo S60
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP140 HP
Torque: 206 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds11 seconds
Volvo 850 and Volvo S60 have the same engine power, but Volvo 850 torque is 14 NM less than Volvo S60.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.39.6
Volvo 850 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volvo 850 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 73 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway970 km on highway
Volvo 850 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.40 m1.43 m
Volvo 850 is 8 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 850 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 445 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Volvo 850 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo 850 has 21 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Volvo 850 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6002`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Volvo S60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 850 has serious deffects in 410 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12001600
Pros and Cons: Volvo 850 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv