Volvo 850 1996 vs Volvo V70 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 850 engine produces 75 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Volvo 850 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo 850 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 850 could require 255 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo 850 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Volvo 850 is smaller. Volvo 850 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 850 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | 1580 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means Volvo 850 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 850 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |