Volvo 850 1996 vs Volvo S80 1999

 
Volvo 850
1996 - 1997
Volvo S80
1999 - 2003
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 250 HP140 HP
Torque: 350 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 seconds10 seconds
Volvo 850 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo 850 engine produces 110 HP more power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Volvo 850 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.08.9
Real fuel consumption: 10.9 l/100km8.8 l/100km
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo 850 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 850 could require 165 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 850 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80.
Fuel tank capacity: 73 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
660 km with real consumption790 km with real consumption
Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.82 m
Width: 1.76 m1.83 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Volvo 850 is smaller.
Volvo 850 is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1580 litres1106 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Volvo 850 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9002`140
Safety: no data
Quality:Volvo S80 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 850 has serious deffects in 230 percent more cases than Volvo S80, so Volvo S80 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16001200
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 8.6/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo 850 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Volvo S80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv