Volvo 850 1994 vs Volvo 940 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 158 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Volvo 850 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 850 engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Volvo 940. Thanks to more power Volvo 850 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo 850 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo 850 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that by driving the Volvo 850 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 850 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo 850) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Volvo 940) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Volvo 850 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 850 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | 2125 litres | |
|
Volvo 940 has more luggage space. Volvo 850 has 572 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 940. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 940 (by 545 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo 940, which means Volvo 850 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 850 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 850 has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |